In “The Myth of Positive Thinking” (Liberty Sports Magazine, June/July 2010), Dr. Mitchell Greene challenges the oft-used strategy of getting “athletes to be more positive and to rid themselves of negative thoughts.” Dr. Greene, sport psychology consultant to The Philadelphia Triathlon and SheRox Triathlon series, contends that any attempts to “be more optimistic and confident” can have the opposite effect by “unnerving” the athlete. Instead of trying to control our negative thoughts, we’d be better served acknowledging our self-doubt and lowering their impactfulness.
Many psychologists, coaches, and even the athletes themselves, have attempted to solve this interplay of the mind and performance. Why are we anxious before races, suffer after a poor outing or choke under the pressure? Matthew Syed, former British table tennis Olympian explains in his book “Bounce: Mozart, Federer, Picasso, Beckham and the Science of Success”, that choking boils down to reverting to more novice behavior. He notes that the brain utilizes two different systems – “explicit” (prefrontal cortex activation) and “implicit” (basal ganglia area) to respond to motor stimuli. “This migration from the explicit to the implicit system of the brain has two crucial advantages. First, it enables…the integrat[ion] the various parts of a complex skill into one fluent whole…and, second, it frees up attention to focus on…tactics and strategy.”
So Syed gives some roundabout credence to Dr. Greene’s belief of quieting the “mind-chatter” with his mention of the “doublethink” principle: constant reinforcement that the race “doesn’t matter.” Athletes calming themselves and gaining confidence from trivializing the significance of the event. Hard to believe, right? Did Jordan, Ali, Elway, Jeter, and Bird disassociate or stay in the moment? What made them so clutch? According to Syed, only elite athletes choke. Interesting. The bigger the stakes, the bigger the failures. Says Alberto Salazar, winner of the NYC Marathon from 1980-82, “you are always going to have doubts and fears.”
What is the source of these fears? In several conversations with Dr. Nicholas Romanov, the idea of fear is related to “performing with no concept.” Meaning, at the end of the day, any athlete is only as good as their technique. Without an absolute understanding of the parts, the whole becomes a mess. You under-perform. There is an undeniable interconnection between our thoughts, desires and actions. “The belief in technique”, asserts Dr. Romanov, “gives you the confidence to move beyond your limitations and explore your true potential.” Training which focuses on development of speed, flexibility, coordination and balance will enhance your perception of the whole – the actions that make up one’s individual sport. I seem to remember when competition was most intense, those aforementioned great athletes seemed to live without pressure “in the zone.”
Those of you who have the ability to habituate complex tasks, are most susceptible to “explicit monitoring vying with implicit execution” (surprisingly, though, this “additional attention is likely to benefit execution” for the novice performer). Instead of trying to camouflage “racing jitters and doubts” try focusing on the elements you can control – the aplomb, determination and skill that got you there in the first place.